|
Term Paper on Orality and Literacy
Walter Ong (1982) in his book “Orality and
Literacy” suggests that the nature of self and community change as a culture
moves from pure orality to scribality to textuality. This change is a
movement from exteriority to interiority and from communal structures to the
self-reflective. Let us see how the community changed as different
communication technologies were developed.
The shift from primary oral culture to a literate one in Greece led to
change in language and thought. Ong have characterized the resulting change
in the language and a culture as a shift from the active, participatory
world of orality to the linear static world of print. Ong characterizes the
changes in language and thought growing from the radio and television
broadcast as a secondary orality.
Shift from Orality to Literacy
The word “text” (meaning “to weave”) is actually more compatible with oral
utterance than with literature. Oral disclosure is often thought in terms of
weaving or stitching. The Greek word rhapsoidein means, “To stitch songs
together”. Borrowing, heavily from each other, poets in primary oral
cultures recalled and repeated formulas of popular rhythmic patterns to
rhapsodize songs. Formulaic thought patterns are essential for wisdom and
effective administration in oral cultures. Oral rhyme schemes help commits
ideas to memory.
Click Here To View Top
3 Term Paper Sites
Ong described technology of writing in his book, which transformed human
consciousness. It is not only allowed for the representation of the words as
signs, but it also gave a linear shape to thought and provided a critical
framework within which to think analytically. He said that the beginning of
Greek philosophy was tied in with the restructuring of thought brought about
by writing. Plato’s exclusion of poets from his republic displays a
rejection of the old, warm, mobile, personally interactive life world of
oral culture.
From its very beginning, the technology of writing was associated with
privileged elite. The earliest writing systems, Sumerian cuneiform and
Egyptian hieroglyphics, were the property of priests. Ong says that writing
is capable of interiorizing the self against whom the objective world is
set; it is important to notice that the great introspective religious
traditions, Islam, Christianity, and Hinduism, all are text based. The
literate segment of the population, those who read and interprets assumed an
occult power that elevated their status.
The shift from a primary oral culture to a literate one in ancient Greece
came about because of the invention of the Greek vowels in the fourth
century BCE. With the Greek alphabets, texts could be made which matched
written speech. This encouraged writing and the standardization of the Greek
alphabet led to widespread literacy, the beginning of a manuscript culture,
and the permanent loss of primary orality in western cultures.
In the 15th century, Gutenberg invented the printing press and
revolutionized possibilities for the dissemination of written text. The
manuscript culture becomes a print culture. The invention of the printing
press, while democratizing what was once exclusively the property of the
priests furthered the writing’s distance from the sound world to the world
of visual space.
Qualities of an oral culture
• Aggregative closely related to the idea of being additive, oral speech
tends to work by building up levels of details to characterize things,
rather than a concise statement about an object.
• Because oral discourse must rely on memory, it is often redundant and
copious. In speech acts, the listener may be distracted for a moment.
• An oral culture tends to value those who can preserve what has been said,
and value the wisdom of wise old sages. Therefore, an oral culture must
expand great energy to preserve what has been said. In contrast, a literate
culture, secure in the knowledge that the past can be preserved, tends to
favor something new.
• In an oral culture, learning is by apprehension; there are no “how-to”
manuals. In a literate culture, analytic categories can be used to structure
knowledge.
• In oral societies, the speaker and the listener coexist within the same
point in space and time. When a person makes some statement, the listener is
bound to respond. This is unlike a literate culture, which separates the
author from the reader, and removes speech from situations in which human
interacts and struggle.
Conclusion
Ong’s proposes a transformation of consciousness that accompanies the move
from orality to literacy to print. The move to print includes the technology
of virtually identical reproduction of pages, as well as text and images.
Modern science developed from such technology. According to Ong, an
evolution in human consciousness has been under way as a continuation of
words and print. According to him, when a medium like hypertext meets the
modern reader and writer, they will know a more open ended and more
interiorized experience of language and meaning. They will experience an
intensified sequential processing of the word.
|